Back to docs

AI Friendliness

CBrowser's AI-Friendliness suite helps you make your website ready for AI agents. Your site needs to work for both humans and machines.

Why AI-Friendliness Matters

AI agents are now browsing the web:

  • Retrieval agents extract product info, prices, and content
  • Task agents fill forms, complete checkouts, book appointments
  • Conversational agents answer questions using your site data
  • Crawl agents index and understand your content

Sites that work well for AI agents see:

  • Higher visibility in AI-powered search
  • Better integration with AI assistants
  • Less support load as AI handles common tasks

The Four Pillars

Pillar Weight What It Measures
Findability 35% Can agents locate elements by intent? (ARIA labels, data-testid, semantic HTML)
Stability 30% Will selectors survive DOM changes? (Stable IDs, no dynamic classes)
Accessibility 20% ARIA labels, semantic HTML, keyboard navigation
Semantics 15% JSON-LD, llms.txt, heading hierarchy, meaningful labels

Tools

Tool-Agent-Ready-Audit

Score your site's AI-friendliness (A-F grade) with 17 detection functions.

npx cbrowser agent-ready-audit "https://example.com"

Tool-AI-Benchmark

Compare AI-friendliness across competitor sites.

npx cbrowser ai-benchmark "https://yoursite.com" "https://competitor.com"

Tool-Remediation

Get code patches to fix AI-unfriendly patterns.

npx cbrowser remediation-patches "https://example.com"

Tool-Llms-Txt

Generate, validate, and diff llms.txt files.

npx cbrowser llms-txt generate "https://example.com"
npx cbrowser llms-txt validate "https://example.com"

MCP Tools

Tool Description
agent_ready_audit Audit site for AI-agent friendliness
ai_benchmark Compare AI-friendliness across sites
remediation_patches Generate code patches for issues
llms_txt_generate Generate llms.txt from site content
llms_txt_validate Validate existing llms.txt
llms_txt_diff Compare llms.txt versions
structured_data_suggest Suggest JSON-LD improvements

Grading Scale

Grade Score Meaning
A 90-100 Excellent - AI agents work seamlessly
B 80-89 Good - Minor improvements possible
C 70-79 Fair - Some friction for AI agents
D 60-69 Poor - Significant barriers
F 0-59 Failing - Major overhaul needed

Web Documentation

For full guides with interactive examples, visit:

Related


Copyright: (c) 2026 Alexa Eden.

License: MIT License

Contact: [email protected]

From the Blog